<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Dice: An OBVIOUS StumbleUpon Rip-Off</title>
	<link>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Friday Tea Time - 4/27/07 &#187; TheMadHat</title>
		<link>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/#comment-7661</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/#comment-7661</guid>
					<description>[...] * The pepperjam folks point out Google&#8217;s completely obvious StumbleUpon clone. I agree and then I don&#8217;t. Google Dice was an attempt to clone, but it sucks ass and doesn&#8217;t work the same way. I want to see new stuff, not crap I just read five minutes ago. Hey Google, try working on this first. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] * The pepperjam folks point out Google&#8217;s completely obvious StumbleUpon clone. I agree and then I don&#8217;t. Google Dice was an attempt to clone, but it sucks ass and doesn&#8217;t work the same way. I want to see new stuff, not crap I just read five minutes ago. Hey Google, try working on this first. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dean Karasinski</title>
		<link>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/#comment-7607</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/#comment-7607</guid>
					<description>Hahaha. Guys I completely agree it is such a half-assed attempt at something cool, how could you roll out this piece of crap under the radar like that? i mean I know Google does this alot  but seriously after such a high profile buy people are going to jump on you and quick about this stuff. I mean there are no unique features except that it doesn't have any!!

Maybe they will add something to adwords to have your web page included in the GoogelDice results??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha. Guys I completely agree it is such a half-assed attempt at something cool, how could you roll out this piece of crap under the radar like that? i mean I know Google does this alot  but seriously after such a high profile buy people are going to jump on you and quick about this stuff. I mean there are no unique features except that it doesn&#8217;t have any!!</p>
<p>Maybe they will add something to adwords to have your web page included in the GoogelDice results??
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hawaii SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/#comment-7605</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/#comment-7605</guid>
					<description>No... It;s not a rip off at all because it sucks. It just doesn't work very well at all. It feeds me crap that I've already seen.  The human edited Stunbleupon feeds me great stuff. 

Maybe Google will develop an algorithm to suggest hot new music but I don't think the robot will be all that hip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230; It;s not a rip off at all because it sucks. It just doesn&#8217;t work very well at all. It feeds me crap that I&#8217;ve already seen.  The human edited Stunbleupon feeds me great stuff. </p>
<p>Maybe Google will develop an algorithm to suggest hot new music but I don&#8217;t think the robot will be all that hip.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jessecooper</title>
		<link>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/#comment-7600</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/#comment-7600</guid>
					<description>ya this was announced several days ago, but Google def. has the ability to kill off some of stumbles growth... it also doesn't have a thumbs style rating system...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya this was announced several days ago, but Google def. has the ability to kill off some of stumbles growth&#8230; it also doesn&#8217;t have a thumbs style rating system&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
