<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Dice: An OBVIOUS StumbleUpon Rip-Off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off</link>
	<description>Search Engine &#38; Affiliate Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:31:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Friday Tea Time - 4/27/07 &#187; TheMadHat</title>
		<link>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/comment-page-1#comment-7661</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Tea Time - 4/27/07 &#187; TheMadHat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pepperjamblog.com/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/#comment-7661</guid>
		<description>[...] * The pepperjam folks point out Google&#8217;s completely obvious StumbleUpon clone. I agree and then I don&#8217;t. Google Dice was an attempt to clone, but it sucks ass and doesn&#8217;t work the same way. I want to see new stuff, not crap I just read five minutes ago. Hey Google, try working on this first. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] * The pepperjam folks point out Google&#8217;s completely obvious StumbleUpon clone. I agree and then I don&#8217;t. Google Dice was an attempt to clone, but it sucks ass and doesn&#8217;t work the same way. I want to see new stuff, not crap I just read five minutes ago. Hey Google, try working on this first. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Karasinski</title>
		<link>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/comment-page-1#comment-7607</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Karasinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pepperjamblog.com/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/#comment-7607</guid>
		<description>Hahaha. Guys I completely agree it is such a half-assed attempt at something cool, how could you roll out this piece of crap under the radar like that? i mean I know Google does this alot  but seriously after such a high profile buy people are going to jump on you and quick about this stuff. I mean there are no unique features except that it doesn&#039;t have any!!

Maybe they will add something to adwords to have your web page included in the GoogelDice results??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha. Guys I completely agree it is such a half-assed attempt at something cool, how could you roll out this piece of crap under the radar like that? i mean I know Google does this alot  but seriously after such a high profile buy people are going to jump on you and quick about this stuff. I mean there are no unique features except that it doesn&#8217;t have any!!</p>
<p>Maybe they will add something to adwords to have your web page included in the GoogelDice results??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawaii SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/comment-page-1#comment-7605</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawaii SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pepperjamblog.com/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/#comment-7605</guid>
		<description>No... It;s not a rip off at all because it sucks. It just doesn&#039;t work very well at all. It feeds me crap that I&#039;ve already seen.  The human edited Stunbleupon feeds me great stuff. 

Maybe Google will develop an algorithm to suggest hot new music but I don&#039;t think the robot will be all that hip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230; It;s not a rip off at all because it sucks. It just doesn&#8217;t work very well at all. It feeds me crap that I&#8217;ve already seen.  The human edited Stunbleupon feeds me great stuff. </p>
<p>Maybe Google will develop an algorithm to suggest hot new music but I don&#8217;t think the robot will be all that hip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessecooper</title>
		<link>http://www.pepperjam.com/blog/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/comment-page-1#comment-7600</link>
		<dc:creator>jessecooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pepperjamblog.com/2007/04/24/google-dice-an-obvious-stumbleupon-rip-off/#comment-7600</guid>
		<description>ya this was announced several days ago, but Google def. has the ability to kill off some of stumbles growth... it also doesn&#039;t have a thumbs style rating system...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya this was announced several days ago, but Google def. has the ability to kill off some of stumbles growth&#8230; it also doesn&#8217;t have a thumbs style rating system&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
