Search Arbitrage: Good or Evil? An “Affiliate” Point of View
Thursday, September 28th, 2006
Catherine Seda (prolific writer, industry vet, and business columnist for Entrepreneur Magazine) covered a panel that I participated in during the recent Search-Engine Strategies conference in San-Jose, CA. Here is a LINK to the article that was posted today on Search Engine Watch.
Catherine goes on to explain the traditional definition of “Search Arbitrage” by referencing the stock market. Here’s what she said: “Skilled traders of bonds, commodities or other equities often leverage their bets using arbitrage to take advantage of price differences in the marketplace. With a bit of creativity, you can use arbitrage to profit from price differences in search engine advertising programs.”
The goal of this post is twofold. First, I want to draw a line in the sand (a contrast if you will) between “bad” Made-For-Adsense (MFA) search arbitragers and legitimate, sophisticated search-engine marketing affiliate arbitragers. Second, I will argue that Google’s recent paid search algorithm tweak that uses an automated “landing page quality score” to influence CPC prices of search arbitragers unjustly affects SEM affiliates.
From an affiliate perspective, search arbitrage is when an affiliate marketer buys their own ads on Google, Yahoo and the like in hopes that they can turn the traffic into profit by converting that traffic into affiliate sales. Since the affiliate marketer gets paid on a performance basis, if they can pay less for traffic than they get in commissions, they make money – at Pepperjam, we break this money making strategy down into a simple concept called “playing the spread” – the spread is defined by the difference between the amount you spend on the engines and the amount you make on Commission Junction, Linkshare, Performics, Digital River, etc.
Catherine does a nice job giving a brief overview of search arbitrage, and she does use my comments to explain that there IS A MAJOR DIFFERENCE between search arbitragers who use made-for-adsense websites (MFA’s) to arbitrage and search-engine marketing affiliates who provide significant value to merchants and consumers alike. Let me explain what I mean, briefly.
MFA website advertisers do nothing more than confuse the consumer by purchasing ads on Google, Yahoo, etc. and sending the traffic to a dedicated page serving Google Adsense / Yahoo Publisher ads. The MFA advertiser makes money by purchasing “inexpensive” traffic and sending the traffic through MFA pages that contain high paying Google Adsense or Yahoo ads. Does this work? From what I understand the top MFA advertisers have made millions per month.
The huge problem with MFA websites is that they provide the user (the individual using search to find products, services, information) with a list of irrelevant ads. The MFA advertiser recirculates ads not to provide the user with more accurate results or similarly relevant results, but with ads that pay them more money on the publisher side. If you read the article at SEW here, you’ll see that I actually side with Google in that these kinds of search arbitragers aren’t good for search.
However, I also argue that Google’s attempt to eliminate MFA affiliates has unfairly caused serious collateral damage to search-engine marketing affiliates. In fact, in many cases legitimate affiliate marketers (the folks who use Commission Junction, Linkshare, etc. to generate sales for merchant partners) have been required to pay as much as $10-15 dollars CPC or have all ads associated with the campaign deactivated.
How can Google do this? Well, as part of Google’s recent change to their paid search algorithm, which was supposedly meant to eliminate /minimize MFA advertisers, Google now has what they refer to as a “landing page quality score” that factors into whether advertisers have to pay .35 cents (for example) or $10 (for example) for the same keyword. In this regard, Google clearly oversteps the intention of the new rule and in the process creates an unacceptable number of false positives (advertisers unjustly affected by the change in that they clearly have “high quality” landing pages and are not MFA websites.)
We will save the topic of what constitutes a quality landing page and what doesn’t for another time – however, I will say that if search-engine marketing affiliates are making money by sending traffic through a landing page that CONVERTS into a sale for a merchant, the landing page is likely of high quality. Think about it - profitable search engine marketing affiliates are sending traffic to landing pages that are promoting specific merchants, products & services – the only way to do this profitably is to send the most relevant and inexpensive traffic you could buy to the most relevant merchant offers? Clearly, this is different than what the MFA advertisers are doing. The MFA scenario has almost no value to the user and the SEM affiliate situation provides great value to the user…in fact, in many cases the search-engine marketing affiliate is more sophisticated than the merchant themselves. How can this be possible – think about it, affiliates have a smaller “spread…aka, profit margin” and therefore are forced to focus on only connecting targeted traffic with relevant products and services. I can go on and on about this major difference between MFA search arbitragers and search-engine marketing affiliate arbitragers, but I think you get the point…
FYI: Fellow Pepperjam Blogger Michael Jones recently blogged about this topic over at ReveNews.com. Also – check out ShoeMoney’s controversial blog post on this issue HERE.



Well – I was checking out the 






